angel_xxl1:ok I will try to find one . they are speaking about this fair use policy in the computeractive magazine of this week .aapoprently it's not just a problem with pipex
It seems to me that it is fundamental to an "unlimited service" that some users will be heavier users than others - and that attracting lowish users is going to be balanced by higher users. Indeed if an ISP offers limited services, then by definition that will attract the lower users, and will increase the average heaviness of "unlimited" users.
So, the key questions appear to me to be:
a. Is a Fair Use Policy actually consistent with a service which is stated as Unlimited - particularly when there are other cheaper services which do have limits? By definition a Fair Use Policy places limits on how much you use the service, and therefore it may be legally impossible to implement one on a service which is defined as "Unlimited".
b. The next question is whether a Fair Use Policy is actually a means for ensuring that other users of a contended service are not disadvantaged or whether it is a means for the ISP to save costs by limiting bandwidth provision.
I have no problems whatsoever with use of bandwidth shaping technologies or a clearly defined Fair Use Policy which is designed to ensure that the fundamental shared nature of ADSL does not disadvantage other customers PROVIDING that these are limited to those times where other users would be disadvantaged, that it is NOT a means for the ISP to save costs by limiting bandwidth provision, and that I am not disadvantaged at times where other customers are not significantly adversely affected by my own usage.
My problem with the current intents of Pipex (and other ISPs) is that neither the bandwidth shaping technoloogies nor Fair Use Policies are being applied in this way.
Some ISPs are using bandwidth limiters to restrict the bandwidth available to a user to e.g. 64kb at any time of the day once they have reached some sort of monthly limit - hardly an "unlimited" service.
Pipex have implemented some form of bandwidth management in 2005 - but the details are not (as far as I know) published - so it is not possible to determine whether this only shapes bandwidth for certain users at peak times or whether it has a more draconian approach.
So, my personal view is that Fair Use Policies and Fair Use technological solutions are legitimate if they are applied fairly - but as far as I can tell ISP's do not appear to apply them fairly - they appear to apply them to save costs.
I will look forward to reading ComputerActive.
Sophist