SJ
This is allegedly how they work, picked up from another forum.
It seems that Green & co is a trade name of the Royal Bank of Scotland, which only covers solicitors they contract.
what happens is that this letter is sent out by RBS (not by a solicitor) in a standard template, and they then contract a solicitor under that trade name if they wish to go forward. This is confirmed by the print at the bottom of the letter, that this is the 'practicing name of solicitors employed by the Royal Bank of Scotland'. In other words they are not actually a law firm, and do not retain solicitors on staff, but any who are asked to represent RBS use this name if they are later contracted by RBS
Green and co is therefore simply a name under which of RBS pays the contracts to solicitors. However there is the name of the principle at the bottom - j.a.m. green l.l.b.
If this solicitor does not exist, this does appear to contravene the OFT collection guidelines and the Law Society may also have concerns about. However, I do seem to recall that RBS were challenged about this before and it was not found to be unacceptable to use this. This was on the basis that RBS might contract a lot of different solicitors.
As this is a new thread, without looking at your previous posts, have RBS/Triton sent you a valid CCA? What letters have you sent them so far?
It would only be worth writing to these people to challenge them to supply information to substantiate that they have the required original documents which are capable of being enforced by a court. And that you would defend any such action, should they decide to proceed in that direction.
Huckster